Will the Cycle End?

(Updated 5/12/07, see **).

Virgie Mae Arthur was just 14 years old when she gave birth to her first child, David Tacker, Jr. The father of the boy was 17, and Virgie’s (non-blood related) stepbrother**. Some reports say that Arthur and Tacker, Sr. married before their son was born; others list only Arthur’s five marriages afterwards.

Seventeen is the age of consent in Texas. One might argue that regardless of whether Arthur married her stepbrother while pregnant, she could technically be considered a victim of statutory rape, a fact which seems bolstered by the senior Tacker’s arrest record. In 1982, Tacker was arrested for the rape of a child, and convicted for incest.

Arthur’s second husband, Donald Hogan, was alleged in the book “Big Beautiful Doll” to have molested a ten year old Kay Beale. Donald Hogan fathered Arthur’s daughter, Vicki Lynn Hogan, better known as Anna Nicole, in 1967. Arthur divorced Hogan when Anna was two years old, and according to Donna Hogan, he was ordered by the courts to stay away from the family.

Arthur then went on to marry Donald Ray Hart. They had a son, Donald Ray Hart, Jr. in 1972. In an interview with Entertainment Tonight, a thirty-nine year old Anna referred to abuse perpetrated by her mother, stepfather and stepbrother, but did not specify which brother. In “Big Beautiful Doll,” Anna is reported as saying that her mother used to handcuff her to the bed as punishment for leaving the house.

Not much is known about the elder Hart, but the younger one later served six years in prison for assisting in the kidnap and planned murder of a paraplegic woman. People who have interviewed Donald Hart, Jr. say that he appears to have an extremely low IQ and may be borderline retarded. Donald Hart suffered a brain injury when he was three years old.

When Anna was 15, she was sent to live with her aunt Kay Beale’s family in Mexia, Texas. Beale is the mother of “cousin Shelley” who would later make an appearance on Anna Nicole Show. While author Eric Redding made claims of prescription drug abuse by Beale, and methamphetamine use by Shelley, these claims were not backed with solid proof. What is not refuted is that the family was extremely poor. When interviewed by Redding, Kay Beale stated that she would give Anna five dollars of her food stamps in exchange for Anna cleaning the house.

One of Anna’s early boyfriends, Al Bolt, said that when Anna’s career began taking off, she invited the Beale family to live with her. Bolt said, “Her Aunt Kay was very large, very sloppy. Vickie invited her to come from Mexia to Houston to watch out for Daniel. So the whole family just moved in. They were all living there and none of them worked. Vicki was the only breadwinner.”

Anna dropped out of high school after going to live with the Beale family. She had a history of learning difficulties and there are no reports to indicate that this was addressed in any way by her family or the school system. In later years, a judge would make note of her illiteracy in court papers, and the publication and broadcast of Anna’s private diaries and e-mails would open the door to sad and unfortunate public ridicule.

After leaving high school, Anna went to work for Jim’s Krispy Fried Chicken. She married cook Billy Wayne Smith in April 1985, when she was seven months shy of her 18th year. Their son Daniel was born in January 1986, nine months later. The pair separated in 1987 and officially divorced in 1993. The father did not have a relationship with his son. Anna worked a variety of minimum wage jobs before becoming a stripper, and then embarking on a career as model, spokesperson and actress.

Reports vary as to the extent of mother Virgie Arthur’s role in Anna and Daniel’s life in pre-Playmate days. Virgie has made claims that she raised Daniel until he was six years old. Others dispute this, and say that Virgie is exaggerating, and that it was more like four years and that Anna was also present in the home for much of that time, and lived with her mother and son when she was not traveling. Anna’s diary excerpts show that Virgie and daughter “partied” together during this time, so it seems likely that contrary to other claims, Daniel was not abandoned solely to Virgie’s care except in short spurts.

The relationship between Virgie Arthur and her daughter seems to have ebbed and flowed between closeness and estrangement since Anna’s teens. While the last estrangement was the longest, it was not the first, as indicated by Anna’s testimony in the Marshall case.

While Anna’s half-sister Donna Hogan stated that she was “envious” of Anna’s early years, it is apparent that Hogan, who was never in Anna’s childhood home, had no basis for her belief that Anna had a good childhood. Hogan was never close to Anna as a child or as an adult. Her “tell-all” book is useless as a biography about Anna’s true life, but it does have value in exploring the paternal side of Anna’s Texas family.

Besides Donald Hogan, previously mentioned, Hogan’s second wife, Wanda Atkinson (the mother of Donna, Amy and Donald, Jr.) has spent time in and out of mental institutions. All three of her and Hogan’s children have a history of drug use. Donna Hogan, in a Cindy Adams interview, says, “Well, yeah, I’ve done drugs . . . we’ve both had a wild, crazy life . . . and like her, I worked in gentlemen’s clubs. There’s perverts who just want you to get drunk with them. So I’d sit and drink. You could make $2000 a night.” For Amy Hogan, drugs were more than a recreational habit. According to Donna, Amy lost custody of her children due to gross neglect, and spent time homeless due to a pervasive methamphetamine addiction.

Donna Hogan also claims in “Train Wreck” that she once tried to initiate an on-air reunion between Virgie Arthur and the estranged grandson she had not seen in several years. According to Hogan, Virgie was offered $20,000 by the network for her participation, but Virgie wanted more money and turned the opportunity down when her demands were not met. Her claim has not been verified or denied by any network.

As of this writing, Virgie Mae Arthur is in the Bahamas, seeking rights not normally bestowed upon a grandmother. She is seeking the right to sue for wrongful death on behalf of Anna’s estate, and partial custody and/or court-ordered visitation rights. She is also asking that she be made sole custodian of Dannielynn in the event of Larry Birkhead’s death. To this end, she has hired infamous Texas attorney John O’Quinn, whose specialty is multi-million dollar lawsuits and class action cases, not family law. O’Quinn is no stranger to controversy. His firm hired the lead FBI agent that was supposed to be investigating O’Quinn’s possible malfeasance in a tobacco settlement. Presently, he is being taken to court for not paying out to victims the millions he won on their behalf in a judgement against a breast implant manufacturer.

Arthur posits herself as a stable personality. She points to her twenty-eight year career in law enforcement and middle-class status as proof of her ability to care for and nurture a child. It should be noted that Arthur had this same career and status while her own children were growing up, and that it saved none of them from what appears to be an intense, pervasive and long-term cycle of family abuse. Arthur was clearly unable to break that cycle in her own life. Neither her career nor income status produced an ability to break free from the torments of familial victimization.

As a longtime advocate of children’s issues, I understand that Arthur was also once a victim. I have no desire to publicly admonish her for being unable to break a cycle of abuse. Many people in similar situations never find the tools to do so. It takes an enormous amount of strength, courage and will to end an habitually abusive family culture, especially when that is the only one structure a person has ever known. I do not, as some others do, find Virgie Arthur “evil.” However, given her history and her recent demands, I do not believe she is acting in the best interests of her granddaughter, or that her motives are purely well-intentioned. Instead, it appears to me that Arthur, whether conscious of it or not, is acting within a structure founded on the principles of abuse.

By demanding rights not normally afforded to a grandmother, she is seeking not only some control over her granddaughter’s destiny, but of Larry Birkhead’s as well. In seeking joint custody or court-ordered visitation, and labeling her own household and family as “good,” it is clear that Arthur has not come to terms with the extent of her own family’s torturous cycle. Left with unsupervised visits, there is no telling whose lap Dannielynn will fall into, and given the family’s history this should be a cause for great concern, if not outright alarm.

Lastly, as the father of Dannielynn, it is Birkhead’s decision whether to pursue legal claims on her behalf. By aligning herself with an attorney like O’Quinn and seeking to file a separate wrongful death claim of her own, Arthur is clearly acting for her own motives, without true regard for Dannielynn or the child’s father. A grandmother who once said that “all she wanted” was for Dannielynn to live with her biological father, and to be able to “be a grandma” has morphed into a woman seeking to no small amount of control over a granddaughter, a father, and a deceased daughter’s estate. One of the hallmarks of an abusive personality is the attempt to exercise inappropriate control over the lives of others. I believe that Arthur’s attempts to wrestle control from Birkhead, and those whom Anna trusted to oversee her affairs, show that Arthur has not recovered from her past, but is still actively perpetuating the cycle of abuse that has dominated her family for at least several decades.

**5/12/2007 CORRECTION: Virgie’s mother Paralee and David Tacker’s father George were not married at the time of David Tacker, Jr.’s birth. Their marriage occured 10 months later.

7 Comments »

  1. Aggie said,

    April 23rd, 2007 at 10:11 pm

    Hi Jane,

    Thank you very much for putting your insightful and well written articles back on your blog.

    I am adding some parts of a personal supportive letter I emailed to you after I discovered your blog had been closed.

    There are so many things that we don’t understand or like about this story…and you wrote what so many of us felt but we just couldn’t put it into words the way you did.

    Your articles were needed for those of us who feel that the media is so unfair and cruel to this one man…your site was so positive and helped many of us cope with what we felt was so very wrong.

    I think all of us who have become involved in this story have learned something about ourselves. With your writings I believe that you would never have followed a lynching mob in the old days, you would have spoken out and tried to defend and help the people that you felt were wronged. I like to think that I would have been this type of person also. I also believe that we are these type of decent people today.

    The other day when you first put your blog up again you wrote about what made you want to get involved in what you saw were the wrongs in our society. Part of your story was about a little 13 year old girl who had just given birth and she asked as the doctor was sewing her up “When can I have sex again?” Then you wrote about the gossip of the people in the hospital who found out about it and how they labeled this little girl. Then you continued on that once a social worker talked to this little girl she found out that the child’s step-father had been raping her for two years, and she asked “When can I have sex again?” because she thought that the longer the doctor said she couldn’t have sex…the more time she had before he raped her again. I hope you will put that story up on your blog again. I know those of us who are your readers are a PUSHY BUNCH :-), but Jane you have to know that we love your writing, and we are your supportive fans and your supportive friends.

    Thank you so much once again, and remember always that you are doing the right thing when you follow your heart and share with others your heartfelt feelings.

    Take care of yourself Jane and I look forward to more of your wonderful writing.

  2. Jane Devin said,

    April 23rd, 2007 at 11:05 pm

    Aww, Aggie. Your letter really touched me. Yes, that story will find its way back to another article soon. It’s something that really changed my entire perspective on people and gossip.

  3. A. Bar said,

    April 24th, 2007 at 2:49 am

    Bravo Jane!!
    You know I love reading your articles. You are a wonderful, intelligent woman. Although there may be those in the world who envy your talent, there are so many more who admire it.
    It is a privilege to read your blog.
    Keep it up!
    Angela

  4. Logical said,

    April 24th, 2007 at 7:07 am

    Jane!

    I’m so glad you reposted your article. Your articles are well researched and impeccably written!

    You write with the voice of an angel.

  5. Sherry Levin said,

    April 27th, 2007 at 2:35 pm

    Jane,

    An exceptionally written article; you do your research extremely well. Look forward to your future articles.

    Sherry Levin
    Toronto, Ontario

  6. Isabel said,

    May 20th, 2007 at 8:00 pm

    What follows is a “cut and past” I brought from the Art Harris site I enjoyed it and thought you might, also, in case some of you may not have seen it.

    freida Says:
    April 28th, 2007 at 7:38 pm
    Good Evening Ladies and Gentlemen,
    I hope Larry had a wake-up call when he finally ‘earned’ his right to hold Dannie Lynn for the first time.
    Babies can do very, strange things to people; especially when in reality they turn out to be the product of your own selfish, sexual gratification without ‘total’ conscience and consideration, that you are ultimately creating another human being’s life.
    Larry has an emotionally supportive, and from what I have read right here, a very, lucrative, financially well-off family base.
    It seems to me his ‘eyes’ have been opened wide, in full view of the mass media and their public viewing audience (his female fan base), to be a cute (hot like Anna), genuine kind of boy man…in other words, a typical ‘real nice guy.’

    So, as much as I would like to discredit him, because of…
    1. Evil e-mails to Anna
    2. Taking full advantage of Anna as her private photographer
    3. Knocking her up on purpose, to have a million dollar baby
    4. That God-Awful ugly bio seen on BRAVO about Anna
    5. His alliance to G. Ben Thompson and Ford Shelley
    6. Testifying under oath, implicating Howard K. Stern as an enabler, baby kidnapper, or worse.
    7. Breaching Legal Documents
    8. Not honoring the Mother of his Child
    9. Not trying to help a possible drug addict, Mother of Child, and blaming that on others.
    10. Not buying Anna a simple pair of sunglasses
    11. Not honoring Anna’s wishes
    12. Hugging, aiding and abetting Virgie Authur
    13. Aligning forces with Debra Opra
    14. Fighting with Anna when she was sick
    15. Not being a really nice guy
    16. Not providing for his wife before conceiving a child
    17. Not committing to and taking vows of marriage to the Mother of his child
    18. Probably not being true to the Mother of his child
    19. Wanting money more than this child
    20. Probably participating in drug use with the Mother of his child

    (NOTE: These items are not in order of precedence.)

    Maybe I was wrong to judge him?
    Dannilyn will someday outwit her ‘Parent.’
    She will want all the answers.
    She will ask why, and she will demand answers.
    She will make her own assessments, she will make her own decisions, she will grow and she will know…

    THE TRUTH.

    I was a kid once…and now I have one, and she wants to know everything.
    She is not easily convinced, and maybe she gets that from her mother…but I think it’s innate.

  7. yikes! said,

    May 27th, 2007 at 5:06 pm

    IF I never see another boring post by this Freida person, it will be too soon…zzzzzz

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URL

Post a Comment